Skip to main content

Melodrama

Podemos, a famous word in the Spanish streets that has been ringing in every TV show, newspaper article, manifesto and demonstration throughout the past year or so. This leftist quasi-revolutionary party has swept the nation and stole the heart and minds of many disenchanted Spaniards. Promising equality, free services to all, absolute intolerance to corruption, national sovereignty over all national matters and a dignified living standards to all citizens, it is no wonder surveys on upcoming national elections indicate that the new party will come third after the scandal-ridden PP and PSOE.
The euphoria and honey moon phase seems to have lasted quite long, and what might have been considered as a mere reaction to countless cases of corruption and inefficiency in the political arena seems to be a self-proclaimed key political player. There is no questioning of the efforts exerted by the party leader and members in galvanizing public support and in working out a political platform that appeals to the masses. The party has been active in universities, streets, institutions, media and the local governments, trying to find a way out of the political mess that has characterized Spanish politics for some time now. This will not be put to doubt, but perhaps it will also be interesting to relate the jubilant and ambitious political discourse of the party with what has been labelled “Left Melodrama**’”. The writer explains quite interestingly that
“Political-theoretical analysis in left melodrama unfolds within a heightened drama that employs categorizations of villainy and victimhood, cycles of pathos and action, and a moral economy of good and evil to organize its critical inquiry. Left melodrama's appeal derives from the moral clarity it confers on difficult situations, the virtuous power it bestows upon subjugation and the assurance it offers that heroic emancipation can conquer the villainous source of oppression. Although left melodrama intends to galvanize its audience for social change, its conventions limit its capacity to depict the distinct challenges and unintended effects of political life.”
Perhaps one should be aware of the melancholic tendencies of leftist slogans and moral stand points. Easy it is to paint a picture of heroism, self-sacrifice and self-righteousness, but reality always always proved otherwise. If politics is indeed but a work of art, a scene in a never-ending play, the audience needs to keep an eye on blazing sentiments of melodramatic actors, as appealing as they may be, as they often end up offering nothing but a good show.

** 

Left melodrama

Elisabeth Anker
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/cpt/journal/v11/n2/full/cpt201110a.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Just as Orwell Said

         George Orwell said in his famous book 1984 that “first they steal the words, then they steal the meaning”, accurately foreseeing the political actions of world leaders and their manipulation of public opinion. His words are ever so precise once one examines the vocabulary applied by a number of world leaders when describing the policies and regimes of troubling countries: axis of evil, war on terror, terrorist killers, harbourers of fundamentalism etc. Ironic it is to see how those who were once described to have been allies with Satan himself seem to show good will in a matter of very few years. Iran is one very good example of this. The Persian nation has come out as a winner in the Geneva talks that were held in October, where not only did it get applauded for the concessions it offered, but it also ensured the west’s acceptance of its regional weight. Everyone seems to be more relaxed after the negotiations and ...

Kaftar

Muaawiya Bin Abi Sufyan was the first Umayyad Caliph, who ruled as a just and jovial leader until his death in 683 AD. Known for his sense of humour and his love for women, Abi Sufyan was famous for a story that took place in his own harem. While escorting a woman for the Khorasan region in modern day Iran, a beautiful woman entered the harem and mesmerised the Leader of All Believers. With his pride in his manhood and prowess in the bed arena, Abi Sufyan did not hesitate to engage in a brazen and manly sexual act in front of the Khorasani woman, who was patiently waiting for her turn. After he was done, he turned victoriously to his first concubine and asked her how to say ‘lion' in Persian - in a direct analogy to his sexual performance.  The Khorasani woman, unamused, told him slyly, that lion is kaftar in Persian. The Caliph went back to his Court ever so jubilant and told his subjects – repeatedly – that he was one lucky kaftar. His...

Público o Privado?

In los años 70, la administración pública dominaba la provisión de los servicios públicos, donde el término “servicios públicos” y el “sector publico” fueron sinónimos (Grout, 2008). Desde entonces, el mundo ha visto un movimiento hacia el sector privado para la provisión de los servicios públicos, algo que puede perjudicar el concepto de estado de bienestar.  Antes de hacer una comparación entre la provisión de los servicios por el sector privado y la administración publica tradicional, se debe antes fijar en el concepto de estado de bienestar. Este estado interviene, tanto en el nivel central como en el nivel autonómico y local, para mejorar el bienestar social y la calidad de vida de la población, a través de los servicios públicos, las transferencias sociales, intervenciones normativas e intervenciones públicas (Navarro, 2004). Entonces, se puede entender que este estado asume la responsabilidad de mejorar la calidad de vida, el desarrollo y el bienestar de la població...