The financial crisis. A dark gloomy cloud lingering in
the skies of Europe since 2008, obstructing any filtration of sunrays to
lighten up the dark patches of impoverished lands and lives in this super mega
power. Desperate measures have been followed in most affected countries, and
when those did not work, people turned on one another and separatist movements
emerged, demanding independence from the whole to achieve economic salvation
for the part. Others decided to expand and annex territories with historic
ties, and others decided to re-examine economics 101 and EU 101. In all cases,
innovative steps and plans saw light after the crisis, and so did the rhetoric
of political movements and parties. Not only has the crisis impacted parties,
their programs and their discourse, but it has also led to a certain
radicalization of ideologies that have dug so deep into the belief-base of some
societies in a very short period of time and has been feeding citizens hopes
and convictions equally as fast.
It is no secret that one of the consequences of the
crisis has been the rise of European radical left parties. Unemployment,
inequality and failing austerity measures have acted as the perfect pretext to
use neo-liberalism as the scapegoat for all the problems these societies
are going through. Now an educated society learns that demonizing an ideology
is both futile and ludicrous, as problems stem from a series of factors and not
a mere economic policy that went wrong. Or is that so?
Walking down the University of Alicante’s path leading
towards its general library, a small stand surrounded with white banners and
hippie-looking-promoters were handing out flyers in a serene attitude with a
hint of tamed indignation. The stand was supporting an initiative with the
title of “Nómina Digna Para Todos” (dignified salary for all),
attempting to gather as many signatories as possible in order to officially
present the initiative to local authorities. In a nutshell, the initiative
calls for a dignified life for all Spanish citizens, employed and unemployed. Just
by the act of being born, every Spanish citizen must enjoy a dignified
life guaranteed by a fixed salary that he/she receives after a certain age,
irrespective of their job status. Given that many are unemployed, the minimum
that the state can do is ensure dignified living standards to all its citizens
by providing those unemployment and without unemployment benefits with monthly
salaries. After all, the social contract between citizens and the state can
literally mean so: a contract between the state and the citizens where the latter
provides and the former sponsors…and if the provision side of the deal cannot
come through, the contract’s provisions must be modified so as to ensure sponsorship
no matter what. What is missing from the utopian plan is the financial factor –
and since the option of money growing trees has been explored and unfortunately
deemed difficult – another plan is being suggested by the initiative. Cuts on
expenses and restructuring of loans are amongst the proposed steps. I am no
economist so I am not going to get into this aspect of the proposal, although
one proposal does stand out. Raised tax on well-off citizens.
Those hording, greedy, fat pay-checks country-club
set guys must be burned at the stake, but since their money is needed-and
income generating jobs too, let us not burn them just yet, just tax them. A lot.
And the unjust and excessive amount they make will then be distributed justly.
Perhaps that initiative’s flyer did not state this options per-se, but anyone
with a cool head can read between the lines. The problem of being rich in a
country that is generally socialist in the economic and culture senses was not
a problem really before the crisis. Everyone had jobs and services were
provided to all, rich or poor. Equality was not an issue dwelled upon by the lower
classes as the general needs were satisfied with commendable efficiency. The
green-eyed classist monster was asleep. Now that the rough got going, the poor
are no longer indifferent about what their rich fellow citizens are doing and
not doing. Extreme leftist parties are feeding this social anger and calls on wealth
distribution are being more and more popular. How more socialist can Spain get?
Is what is being proposed logical? Before exploring logic, is it fair?
What is being fed to university students
through this initiative is a culture of dependency and victimization; a
culture where it is ok to be comfortable with what is available and it is
acceptable to whine about conditions that are not in your favour. A culture
that is based on extreme ego-centrism and narcissism, where the government and fellow
citizens owe you everything just by the mere fact of being born Spanish. It does
not matter if you add any value, if you contribute to the society in any shape
of form, if you try to change the status quo by hard work and innovation, if
you assume responsibilities with courage and dignity and if you depend on your
skills and muscles to provide for yourself. Students are being told by this salvation
group that it is ok if you don’t find a job or try to, it is understandable that
you don’t want to leave your comfort zone and look for something else somewhere
else, we fully support your decision to wait for the 9:00 to 15:00 minimum
responsibilities job, as papa government should and will shoulder the burden.
Just be happy.
This unjust, spoilt and lazy utopia should not
be accepted nor promoted, especially amongst the young generation. Social
equity and justice is something, and what is being suggested under this hippie
banner is another. Dignity is an acquired right; the rich people are not the enemy.
Justice is achieved when everyone exerts the exact amount of effort; each
according to his/her won capacities. Retribution would follow suit. Working hard
ten hours a day and getting a lofty pay check should not be recriminated.
Demanding that more tax be imposed on rich people, people who work hard
and sacrificed and still sacrifice much, to pamper the whims of a-simply-born-Spaniard
is simply demagogic. If this call does catch on, it will only lead to the glorification
of a culture of sluggishness and dependency. I hope it does fall on deaf ears,
and the fact that there was no queue lining to sign the notorious petition at the
University’s stand is a positive sign that the petition is fortunately mute.
Comments
Post a Comment