Skip to main content

My Fair Lazy


The financial crisis. A dark gloomy cloud lingering in the skies of Europe since 2008, obstructing any filtration of sunrays to lighten up the dark patches of impoverished lands and lives in this super mega power. Desperate measures have been followed in most affected countries, and when those did not work, people turned on one another and separatist movements emerged, demanding independence from the whole to achieve economic salvation for the part. Others decided to expand and annex territories with historic ties, and others decided to re-examine economics 101 and EU 101. In all cases, innovative steps and plans saw light after the crisis, and so did the rhetoric of political movements and parties. Not only has the crisis impacted parties, their programs and their discourse, but it has also led to a certain radicalization of ideologies that have dug so deep into the belief-base of some societies in a very short period of time and has been feeding citizens hopes and convictions equally as fast.

It is no secret that one of the consequences of the crisis has been the rise of European radical left parties. Unemployment, inequality and failing austerity measures have acted as the perfect pretext to use neo-liberalism as the scapegoat for all the problems these societies are going through. Now an educated society learns that demonizing an ideology is both futile and ludicrous, as problems stem from a series of factors and not a mere economic policy that went wrong. Or is that so?

Walking down the University of Alicante’s path leading towards its general library, a small stand surrounded with white banners and hippie-looking-promoters were handing out flyers in a serene attitude with a hint of tamed indignation. The stand was supporting an initiative with the title of “Nómina Digna Para Todos” (dignified salary for all), attempting to gather as many signatories as possible in order to officially present the initiative to local authorities. In a nutshell, the initiative calls for a dignified life for all Spanish citizens, employed and unemployed. Just by the act of being born, every Spanish citizen must enjoy a dignified life guaranteed by a fixed salary that he/she receives after a certain age, irrespective of their job status. Given that many are unemployed, the minimum that the state can do is ensure dignified living standards to all its citizens by providing those unemployment and without unemployment benefits with monthly salaries. After all, the social contract between citizens and the state can literally mean so: a contract between the state and the citizens where the latter provides and the former sponsors…and if the provision side of the deal cannot come through, the contract’s provisions must be modified so as to ensure sponsorship no matter what. What is missing from the utopian plan is the financial factor – and since the option of money growing trees has been explored and unfortunately deemed difficult – another plan is being suggested by the initiative. Cuts on expenses and restructuring of loans are amongst the proposed steps. I am no economist so I am not going to get into this aspect of the proposal, although one proposal does stand out. Raised tax on well-off citizens.

Those hording, greedy, fat pay-checks country-club set guys must be burned at the stake, but since their money is needed-and income generating jobs too, let us not burn them just yet, just tax them. A lot. And the unjust and excessive amount they make will then be distributed justly. Perhaps that initiative’s flyer did not state this options per-se, but anyone with a cool head can read between the lines. The problem of being rich in a country that is generally socialist in the economic and culture senses was not a problem really before the crisis. Everyone had jobs and services were provided to all, rich or poor. Equality was not an issue dwelled upon by the lower classes as the general needs were satisfied with commendable efficiency. The green-eyed classist monster was asleep. Now that the rough got going, the poor are no longer indifferent about what their rich fellow citizens are doing and not doing. Extreme leftist parties are feeding this social anger and calls on wealth distribution are being more and more popular. How more socialist can Spain get? Is what is being proposed logical? Before exploring logic, is it fair?

What is being fed to university students through this initiative is a culture of dependency and victimization; a culture where it is ok to be comfortable with what is available and it is acceptable to whine about conditions that are not in your favour. A culture that is based on extreme ego-centrism and narcissism, where the government and fellow citizens owe you everything just by the mere fact of being born Spanish. It does not matter if you add any value, if you contribute to the society in any shape of form, if you try to change the status quo by hard work and innovation, if you assume responsibilities with courage and dignity and if you depend on your skills and muscles to provide for yourself. Students are being told by this salvation group that it is ok if you don’t find a job or try to, it is understandable that you don’t want to leave your comfort zone and look for something else somewhere else, we fully support your decision to wait for the 9:00 to 15:00 minimum responsibilities job, as papa government should and will shoulder the burden. Just be happy.

This unjust, spoilt and lazy utopia should not be accepted nor promoted, especially amongst the young generation. Social equity and justice is something, and what is being suggested under this hippie banner is another. Dignity is an acquired right; the rich people are not the enemy. Justice is achieved when everyone exerts the exact amount of effort; each according to his/her won capacities. Retribution would follow suit. Working hard ten hours a day and getting a lofty pay check should not be recriminated. Demanding that more tax be imposed on rich people, people who work hard and sacrificed and still sacrifice much, to pamper the whims of a-simply-born-Spaniard is simply demagogic. If this call does catch on, it will only lead to the glorification of a culture of sluggishness and dependency. I hope it does fall on deaf ears, and the fact that there was no queue lining to sign the notorious petition at the University’s stand is a positive sign that the petition is fortunately mute.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Just as Orwell Said

         George Orwell said in his famous book 1984 that “first they steal the words, then they steal the meaning”, accurately foreseeing the political actions of world leaders and their manipulation of public opinion. His words are ever so precise once one examines the vocabulary applied by a number of world leaders when describing the policies and regimes of troubling countries: axis of evil, war on terror, terrorist killers, harbourers of fundamentalism etc. Ironic it is to see how those who were once described to have been allies with Satan himself seem to show good will in a matter of very few years. Iran is one very good example of this. The Persian nation has come out as a winner in the Geneva talks that were held in October, where not only did it get applauded for the concessions it offered, but it also ensured the west’s acceptance of its regional weight. Everyone seems to be more relaxed after the negotiations and a new round of talks has been set for November.  

Pan-Arabism vs. Middle Easternism?

             A rab Nationalism, a romantic concept that moved poets to write ballads, intellectuals to preach volumes, activists to passionately organize and the masses to cheer freedom. A concept introduced by students at the American University of Beirut in the last phases of the ageing Ottoman Empire and studied in secret societies. This concept developed and led, under western planning, to the Great Arab Revolt in 1916. The slogans of Arab revival and freedom from Ottoman tyranny swept the Arab nations, where hopes of independence and self-rule were promised by the restoration of Arab control over the area. Then problems arose. Who are Arabs? What is an Aran nation? How does it extend geographically? Is it an area that encompasses people who speak the same language and share the same history? If so, why did the Lebanese Maronites reject the concept of Arab nationalism and insist on a Lebanese identity? Why did the Egyptians hesitate before including themselves under th

Wishing You a New MENA

Journalist and author of A nd Then All Hell Broke Loose: Two Decades in the Middle East   said that “Everything changed with the First World War. The Middle East was reorganized, redefined, and the seeds were planted for a century of bloodshed.” He was not entirely right. Bloodshed lasted more than a century actually. Here we are in 2019, and the Middle East and North Africa region – the infamous MENA – is still a boisterous, rowdy zone of political recrimination, military coups, conspiracy theories, historic reminiscence, oil squabbles, and religiously-infused rhetoric. Blood shed of course as well. Well, here we are.  Algeria is set to head to the polls in April. President Abdelaziz Bouteflika will likely secure a fifth mandate. If not, Algeria’s powerbrokers, mainly the military and powerful business elites will enter into an expensive bargain of security versus social and economic stability. Having vested the long-enjoyed tranquillity on a political figure, rather than a