Skip to main content

Quatre Efff: France's Foreign Friendships Fueds

Marine Le pen’s interview with Euronews on December 1st was – unfortunately – impressive. The notorious leader of the anti-EU Front Nationale, who never shies away from protecting the French identity and interests at any cost – is an important contender for the presidential elections set for 2014. Her stances on the international and regional spheres were clear, direct and confidant. Her over-confidence and conviction in what she stands for and how she will translate these convictions into policies pose a challenge to the consistence of France’s foreign policy. Incremental politics? No cheri.

Le Pen said in her interview that she admires Putin’s “cool head”. She acknowledged that there is a cold war being waged against him by the EU at the behest of United States, defending the rights of Crimean citizens to take back the 1954 gift and return it to its natural owners and condemning the ousting of Viktor Yanukovich and the illegitimate government that came after the putsch. In the calm Middle Eastern front, Le Pen also questioned the validity of French intervention in the war against the ISIS (ISIL), and categorically refused to join a coalition that has Saudi Arabia and Qatar as members, considering that they are one of the financers of Islamic fundamentalism. And finally, Le Pen said straight out: “I doubt everything the Americans say. Is that clear? Whatever the Americans say is questionable”.

These positions reflect absolute divergence from the current French foreign policy, a policy that is accepted and supported by the majority of the French people. Despite opposition, the French people elected a legislature and a president who took certain stances on foreign affairs, assuming that such policies defend the French interests and ideals. When the Peace Camp military base was inaugurated by Sarkozy, it reflected France’s commitment to help defend Arab Gulf countries against an Iranian attack and is still serving France’s foreign relations in its use as a base for France’s participation in the US-led anti-ISIS coalition in Iraq. Moreover, it is a clear message to the USA that Franc is on-board to fight terrorism and is committed to establishing security of the region. France and Saudi Arabia also cooperate on a number of files, whether in commercial relations, diplomatic relations or common interest in the Syrian file. This fanatical terrorism financing cleric regime is not as monstrous as Le Pen paints it be, at least in Holland’s eyes. On the Russian front, France condemned Russia’s stance and acts in Crimea, and joined the EU /NATO coalition against the Russian bear.

Should Le Pen be elected as president in two years time, a major shift in foreign policy is expected. And so is confusion. However, I don’t know who would be more confused, the international community or the French themselves. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Just as Orwell Said

         George Orwell said in his famous book 1984 that “first they steal the words, then they steal the meaning”, accurately foreseeing the political actions of world leaders and their manipulation of public opinion. His words are ever so precise once one examines the vocabulary applied by a number of world leaders when describing the policies and regimes of troubling countries: axis of evil, war on terror, terrorist killers, harbourers of fundamentalism etc. Ironic it is to see how those who were once described to have been allies with Satan himself seem to show good will in a matter of very few years. Iran is one very good example of this. The Persian nation has come out as a winner in the Geneva talks that were held in October, where not only did it get applauded for the concessions it offered, but it also ensured the west’s acceptance of its regional weight. Everyone seems to be more relaxed after the negotiations and a new round of talks has been set for November.  

Pan-Arabism vs. Middle Easternism?

             A rab Nationalism, a romantic concept that moved poets to write ballads, intellectuals to preach volumes, activists to passionately organize and the masses to cheer freedom. A concept introduced by students at the American University of Beirut in the last phases of the ageing Ottoman Empire and studied in secret societies. This concept developed and led, under western planning, to the Great Arab Revolt in 1916. The slogans of Arab revival and freedom from Ottoman tyranny swept the Arab nations, where hopes of independence and self-rule were promised by the restoration of Arab control over the area. Then problems arose. Who are Arabs? What is an Aran nation? How does it extend geographically? Is it an area that encompasses people who speak the same language and share the same history? If so, why did the Lebanese Maronites reject the concept of Arab nationalism and insist on a Lebanese identity? Why did the Egyptians hesitate before including themselves under th

Wishing You a New MENA

Journalist and author of A nd Then All Hell Broke Loose: Two Decades in the Middle East   said that “Everything changed with the First World War. The Middle East was reorganized, redefined, and the seeds were planted for a century of bloodshed.” He was not entirely right. Bloodshed lasted more than a century actually. Here we are in 2019, and the Middle East and North Africa region – the infamous MENA – is still a boisterous, rowdy zone of political recrimination, military coups, conspiracy theories, historic reminiscence, oil squabbles, and religiously-infused rhetoric. Blood shed of course as well. Well, here we are.  Algeria is set to head to the polls in April. President Abdelaziz Bouteflika will likely secure a fifth mandate. If not, Algeria’s powerbrokers, mainly the military and powerful business elites will enter into an expensive bargain of security versus social and economic stability. Having vested the long-enjoyed tranquillity on a political figure, rather than a