Skip to main content

What Muslims Need to Do



Paris. The world had it with Islamic militarism… the Charlie Hebdo incident and the shootings at the Jewish store east Paris were the last straw. World leaders joined hands in the anti-terror rally in Paris to express solidarity with victims’ families, renounce violence and reject any form of suppression to the freedom of expression. EU leaders are also holding meetings to study mechanisms to curb violent Islamic radicalism. Jewish communities in France and elsewhere in Europe are being provided extra-protection against possible acts of vengeance and retaliation. The Israeli government, mourning events, took full advantage of the situation and ran to the podium to draw parallels between jihadism and terrorism, ISIS and Hamas and Islamic extremism and the holocaust.

From the many articles and analysis I read on the matter, one particular op-ed stood out. The author, the respectable journalist and expert, Dr. AbdelBari Atwan, sympathized with the victims and renounced all acts of violence. Nonetheless, he demanded equal treatment to other victims in the same country where the drama was taking place. He pointed out to the many acts of violence and discrimination against Muslim citizens in European countries and the hate crimes committed against the Muslim community in the EU. Fifty mosques in European countries have been burnt down/attacked in the past few years, and governments have drawn a blind eye to such incidents. In conclusion, the author demanded equal protection for Muslim citizens against extreme-right wing movements as well as fair media coverage on what the Muslim community in Europe is suffering from.

I fully agree with the author’s standpoint. However, there is one important issue that he left out. The nature of the attacks against Muslim communities in European states is very different form the Paris attack. The former were orchestrated by independent agents with independent agendas and of diverse ideological affiliations, rather than acting on a religious doctrine. The world, as it appears, is ready to forget about crazy people whose acts are based on radical whims, but not forget those committed by any group operating under Islamic slogans. The fame of Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran’s entire regime and apparatus, Isis, Al Qaeda, Taliban and Al Shabab have dwarfed the threats posed by any other organized terror group and rendered them benign. They helped in creating the Islamic bogeyman. 

No one is really scared of Buddhists slaughtering Muslims in Myanmar, nor ETA militants targeting innocent citizens in Spain, nor racist policemen attacking minorities in the USA, nor a Norwegian gunman going on a killing spree, nor sikhists seeking vengeance from political leaders. The general public is in reality only scared of militant Muslims. Justified is their fear? Well, yes. It is sadly normal to be suspicious of a bearded man on a metro line or on a plane. The media has fed the audience pure terror, and as an average spectator, I would also be terrified. It is what it is, and it is OK to admit it. 

Reza Aslan, the renowned scholar and author of a series of books on religion, demanded that a distinction be made between Muslims and these scandalous Islamic organizations and what they represent. He hoped that people can distinguish between the interpretation of certain regimes of Islamic law and what the religioun is really about and that Islam not be associated with the practices, teachings and acts of terrorist groups and autocratic political regimes. Islam, Muslims, Islamic states and even Islamic militant organizations must not be painted with the same brush. His requests are very legitimate and noble. Yet, does the general public have the time and interest in researching the true tenants of Islam or the struggles of Muslims against their corrupt governments? Is an average 50 year old residing in a rural town in Spain willing to draw a comparative analysis of Islam in thought and practice? No. Who should be responsible to clarify issues then? Muslims.

Unfortunately, Muslims are now required to do what no other religion or ideology is requested to do. Muslims are asked to constantly clear the name of Islam and remind the world of the true teachings, tenants and message behind the religion, renouncing and fighting all claims that have been associated to it due to terrorist organizations. Muslims, as a community, are required to remind the world that they are doctors and nurses, thinkers and linguists, scientists and poets, pilots and inventors. The world needs to appreciate Muslims and their role in this world beyond the “oil and credit card” contribution. Muslim doctors are curing Christian patients, Muslim teachers are educating Jewish students, Muslim aid workers are saving the lives of Hindus, and Muslim scientists are contributing to science and technology. Muslims, in general, are doing well and are in harmony with the world.


There is a war launched against Islam from within, and the only way to fight it is from within. Islamic NGOs, youth associations, think tanks, professional organizations and every civic body must double their efforts to display to the world, through acts and tangible proof, the true face of Islam. The beautiful face of Islam. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Just as Orwell Said

         George Orwell said in his famous book 1984 that “first they steal the words, then they steal the meaning”, accurately foreseeing the political actions of world leaders and their manipulation of public opinion. His words are ever so precise once one examines the vocabulary applied by a number of world leaders when describing the policies and regimes of troubling countries: axis of evil, war on terror, terrorist killers, harbourers of fundamentalism etc. Ironic it is to see how those who were once described to have been allies with Satan himself seem to show good will in a matter of very few years. Iran is one very good example of this. The Persian nation has come out as a winner in the Geneva talks that were held in October, where not only did it get applauded for the concessions it offered, but it also ensured the west’s acceptance of its regional weight. Everyone seems to be more relaxed after the negotiations and a new round of talks has been set for November.  

Pan-Arabism vs. Middle Easternism?

             A rab Nationalism, a romantic concept that moved poets to write ballads, intellectuals to preach volumes, activists to passionately organize and the masses to cheer freedom. A concept introduced by students at the American University of Beirut in the last phases of the ageing Ottoman Empire and studied in secret societies. This concept developed and led, under western planning, to the Great Arab Revolt in 1916. The slogans of Arab revival and freedom from Ottoman tyranny swept the Arab nations, where hopes of independence and self-rule were promised by the restoration of Arab control over the area. Then problems arose. Who are Arabs? What is an Aran nation? How does it extend geographically? Is it an area that encompasses people who speak the same language and share the same history? If so, why did the Lebanese Maronites reject the concept of Arab nationalism and insist on a Lebanese identity? Why did the Egyptians hesitate before including themselves under th

Wishing You a New MENA

Journalist and author of A nd Then All Hell Broke Loose: Two Decades in the Middle East   said that “Everything changed with the First World War. The Middle East was reorganized, redefined, and the seeds were planted for a century of bloodshed.” He was not entirely right. Bloodshed lasted more than a century actually. Here we are in 2019, and the Middle East and North Africa region – the infamous MENA – is still a boisterous, rowdy zone of political recrimination, military coups, conspiracy theories, historic reminiscence, oil squabbles, and religiously-infused rhetoric. Blood shed of course as well. Well, here we are.  Algeria is set to head to the polls in April. President Abdelaziz Bouteflika will likely secure a fifth mandate. If not, Algeria’s powerbrokers, mainly the military and powerful business elites will enter into an expensive bargain of security versus social and economic stability. Having vested the long-enjoyed tranquillity on a political figure, rather than a