The Jordanian pilot, ISIS, vengeance,
conspiracy theories and the western blue print of all of it have been on the
news and social media networks in the past month or so. Regardless of the
in-depth analysis, a Jordanian soldier died and the news spread. Every Jordanian
was appalled to see Muaz Al Kasabe, a fighter jet pilot, burnt to death by the
Islamic State’s militants. When the political leadership decided to retaliate,
people expressed boisterous support to the retrieval of social dignity. The
Jordanian flag hanging on the picture of the deceased pilot became the profile
picture of many...the calls for vengeance for the crime committed against
beloved Jordan escalated and national pride only was bolstered.
The idea of a welfare state is that
which protects its citizens and provides them with all necessary services and
goods to guarantee a dignified life. This promise must be met in the good and
bad times. Just as the water authority is committed to supplying
non-interrupted high quality water services to its citizens across the Kingdom,
the army is committed to acting in utmost bravery and sacrifice to protect the nation
against any attack. Sweet national social contract.
But then again, what if a
neighbouring country went through a period of draught…will the neigh boring
country simply ignore the pleas and suffering of the adjacent nation? And what
if that same nation were under attack by a ruthless barbaric force (that posed
exclusive danger to that nation and not to neighbouring countries); will people
stand looking? Will the excuse of “These barbaric thugs pose no immediate
danger and so we must stay still and wait” do? Will the social contract
signed exclusively between the sovereign/government and the people living
within a restricted geographic boundary hinder the facilitation of services to
people outside the contract? To what extent are legality and morality mutually
exclusive?
The death of the Jordanian pilot
was tragic, but it was no more tragic than the death of thousands of children and
civilians in Syria and Iraq at the hands of ISIS. The pilot was courageously performing
his duties that involved a possible death…the children in ISIS’s captured lands
did nor. Outraged should the society have been with the massacre and enslavement
of the neighbouring nation, with equal if not surpassing indignation.
For a nation that had prided itself
upon following religious codes of conducts (Muslim and Christian) and has
enjoyed a long history of nationalist movements that have fought since the
Great Arab Revolution for the dignity, rights and equality of Arabs, the
reaction of the Jordanian street is very very disappointing. When an opinion
poll reveals that many Jordanians are against the coalition forces fighting
ISIS, on the premises that there are other priorities facing national security,
it is no surprise to be perplexed and embarrassed. When the same poll was
conducted after the slaughter of the pilot, the number of supporters to military
action soared. So that means that now that a Jordanian is involved in
these vicious acts, we must retaliate.
The argument that many employ against
intervention is that what the ISIS is doing is no less barbaric than what the Israeli
Defence Forces have been doing to Palestinians for years, or what the Americans
are doing/have done in Iraq and Afghanistan, or what dictators in Arab states
are doing to their very people. Other arguments are based on the claims
that the USA, Israel and Gulf States are funding this bogyman to create chaos and
facilitate military intervention. Clearly these arguments are neither invalid
nor moral. Despite the factors leading to the birth of ISIS, the people behind
it, the symmetry between their barbaric actions and those of other powerful
nations, the very bottom line of the issue is wrong is wrong. By not fighting the
Islamic State militants on the basis that “we are being tricked into a war
orchestrated by the devil himself” is not valid. People are dying, children are
being orphaned, and women are being enslaved; this IS happening, and stopping
it is a moral necessity, even if injustice is not being fought elsewhere.
According to Larry Nucci, a
psychologist at the University of Illinois, there are three areas that encompass
social behaviour: the personal domain, the domain of social conventions, and
the moral domain. In the last domain, social attitudes and conducts are
intrinsically right or wrong… not socially conditioned or constructed. If we go
back to morals, if we think about the essence of moral behaviour, any other considerations
must be stripped off the argument. The justifications of “we are not in direct
danger”, “other priorities”, “shortage of supplies”, “economic constraints”, “the
western manipulation” etc. should not be any way relevant. What the ISIS is
doing to these people is wrong, and our intervention is right. Loving thy
nation does not mean forgetting about other nations, our humanity, or our
morality. Perhaps the moral compass is broken in that segment of the society
that opposed reaching out a helping hand, or perhaps our understanding of what
morals are is flawed. And if it were a matter of social convention – not to interfere
unless it is absolutely self-threatening - and if morals are affected and blinded by
national pride, then perhaps revisiting one’s senses of national identification
and belonging needs to be done.
To conclude, and in the spirit of such
a flaring moral discourse and hypocritical calls for self –sacrifice (writing
this article whilst sitting safe and warm at home) I post a video of a song written
and performed by a Spanish band (Mundo Chillón**). The artist relays the story of
a man selling nations with a thank-you –for- buying gift…a catalogue of nations
that you can choose from. Well, perhaps I too should consider disowning my
national sense of belonging in the sole case of nationalist romanticism
and pride possibly hazing my moral judgement. Ah self-sacrifice and moral-enslavement…thinking
about Middle East suffering while recalling a night spent listening to the magical
tunes of a Spanish guitar and chirpy songs in a coastal peaceful Spanish city.
** Permission has not been requested to post the video. Please don´t sue me.
Muy buena reflexión Dina. Por desgracia todas las "patrias" que nos venden se comportan igual, mientras sea el de al lado el q tiene problemas... Si vienen a vendernos otras, estaremos alerta!
ReplyDeletePs. Te escribo desde mi cómodo sofá. besos y enhorabuena por el blog!
Cierto; muchas gracias por leer el artículo, por comentar y por tener interés en esta parte del mundo que es un auténtico caos :/ muy intrigada por tu identidad pero me conformo con I@I.
Delete