Skip to main content

The Nationality Business

    Famous is the Spanish government’s offer of granting Spanish residency permits to foreigners who alleviate the country’s economic burdens. Introduced in September 2013, a new law rewards those who buy property worth more than €500,000, invest €1 million or more in shares of publicly traded Spanish companies, deposit at least €1 million in a Spanish bank account or make a major business investment leading to job creation a one year visa, extendable to two years, and renewable thereafter. Spain-lovers from across the world can now buy themselves a residency in the land of fun and sun. The generosity does not stop there. Another interesting gesture, this time orchestrated by the Spanish Justice Minister, Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón, was drafting a bill that would grant Sephardic Jews the Spanish nationality. The bill, which stills needs ratification by the parliament, aims at righting what the government has called a grievous error when Jews were expelled by the Reyes Católicos in 1492, compensating their loss by granting them a Spanish passport without any condition of renouncing their original nationality. The justice Minister said in an interview at The New York Times in March[1] that he anticipated that “more than 150,000 people, scattered in the Sephardic Jewish diaspora, would seek Spanish citizenship under the measure”.

    Interesting. So far, the government, under the first scheme, and according to an El País report[2], has issued 81 visas on the basis of people meeting the law’s requirements, 72 of whom bought property in the country. Almost half of the new residents are Chinese and Russian millionaires, the remaining being Ukrainian, Lebanese, Qatari, Egyptian and Iranian, among others. The government’s figures suggest that the new visa holders will have spent at least €43 million on property, along with at least a further €6 million on purchasing bonds. It adds that the visa scheme will have created around 640 jobs, and around €40 million in investments, mainly in high-tech industries. Under the second scheme, and according to a Jerusalem Post[3] report, the Spanish Justice Ministry had already registered some 3,000 applications and many more are expected to follow.

   As noble as both legislations appear to be, the hidden reasons behind them are not. Granting residency permits on the basis of economic considerations cheapens the concept of pertaining to a nation and forming part of its society. Thousands of immigrants arrive to Spain from African countries looking for opportunities to improve their economic conditions and form part of the labour force (skilled or not) at the same time. Why are these immigrants not easily granted the residency permit? Why are they shot dead at Spanish shores? Why are modest African salesmen who try to start their humble businesses forced into a life of hide-out and illegality (in terms of not obtaining the required documents not in terms of business substance nor nature)? Any resident in Spain – legal resident – understands the bureaucracy and headache that is applying for a residency; why would a €500,000 check make it an easier one? And once this investor is given a residency, why cannot he /she get a work permit in the first year? Why can’t his/her family get a residency as well? Are they a mere piggy bank that serves the sole purpose of injecting money into the country? Instead of rewarding these international billionaires and betting on their investment interests, why not seriously try to boost local businesses and ease unnecessary and complicated measures that hinder entrepreneurial ambitions of Spanish nationals? The meagre number of those who actually applied and obtained the residency under the first scheme is an indication of the very poor and insulting logic behind it. Even if it did save a contractor or two by selling a number of houses, the economy is far from being saved and the seriousness of residency regulations has been much much compromised.

   Now, the second scheme, that of the Jews that were wrongly expulsed from Spain. Apart from the very late apology and quite bizarre compensation, why is the measure racist? What about the Muslims/Arabs who were expelled? Those are not allowed to apply for a nationality? Why is that? Did they not lose their property when they left in the fifteenth century? Did they not have to surrender to the catholic kings and were forced to either convert or leave? Did they not suffer? Or is suffering exclusive to the Jewish nation? And as humanitarian as the plan appears to be, the Justice Minister clearly stated the real reasons lying behind it: the measure, according to him, “does not only intend to repair an injustice done to Jews, but also to repair Spain, where Jewish contributions to art, science and literature flourished before the expulsion”. There is another thing that flourished before the expulsion Minister Gallardón: the economy. The Jewish community, now and then, enjoys excellent financial credentials that come at a very critical time in Spanish history. Ms. Weiss-Tamir (an Israeli lawyer who specializes in applications for citizenship in European countries[4]) explained that just as Jewish applicants are interested in Spanish citizenship for sentimental and family reasons, some Israelis are eager to open businesses in Spain. Michael Freund[5], in the same Jerusalem Post report cited above said that “the prospect of forging anew a link with potentially millions of people of Sephardi ancestry, and the possible windfall that might ensue as a result of increased investment and tourism, was surely not lost on the decision-makers in Madrid when considering the citizenship bill”. He explained that the Sephardic Diaspora can be viewed as a large pool with the potential to benefit the economy provided that it settles and invests.

    Ok, I am generally not against the notion of sealing a deal with the devil himself if that would bring good to people. But things must be called with their proper names. Spain is suffering and needs to use every trick in the book and come up with all sorts of solutions. But don’t lie about your motives please. Remembering in 2012 (when bill was first introduced) to right the wrongs did against the Jewish community is an insult to the intelligence of everyone, Jews being first. Rewarding people with a residency in return for money is actually a commercial deal: give me money I will give you legal rights. Observed from the outside, the Spanish government looks desperate and unethical. Coming clean with the real and hidden motives and going forward with the decisions nonetheless is a lesser evil. Business is business, nothing more, nothing less.




[2] http://elpais.com/elpais/2014/05/23/inenglish/1400837712_504456.html
[3] http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Fundamentally-Freund-From-expulsion-to-expediency-Spain-the-Jews-and-Israel-341941
[5] Founder and chairman of Shavei.

Comments

  1. Marhabapanama provide different qualities in passport. Here are available second passport, dual passport, second citizenship, citizenship by investments, fast legal passport, passport options and buy passports.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Just as Orwell Said

         George Orwell said in his famous book 1984 that “first they steal the words, then they steal the meaning”, accurately foreseeing the political actions of world leaders and their manipulation of public opinion. His words are ever so precise once one examines the vocabulary applied by a number of world leaders when describing the policies and regimes of troubling countries: axis of evil, war on terror, terrorist killers, harbourers of fundamentalism etc. Ironic it is to see how those who were once described to have been allies with Satan himself seem to show good will in a matter of very few years. Iran is one very good example of this. The Persian nation has come out as a winner in the Geneva talks that were held in October, where not only did it get applauded for the concessions it offered, but it also ensured the west’s acceptance of its regional weight. Everyone seems to be more relaxed after the negotiations and a new round of talks has been set for November.  

Pan-Arabism vs. Middle Easternism?

             A rab Nationalism, a romantic concept that moved poets to write ballads, intellectuals to preach volumes, activists to passionately organize and the masses to cheer freedom. A concept introduced by students at the American University of Beirut in the last phases of the ageing Ottoman Empire and studied in secret societies. This concept developed and led, under western planning, to the Great Arab Revolt in 1916. The slogans of Arab revival and freedom from Ottoman tyranny swept the Arab nations, where hopes of independence and self-rule were promised by the restoration of Arab control over the area. Then problems arose. Who are Arabs? What is an Aran nation? How does it extend geographically? Is it an area that encompasses people who speak the same language and share the same history? If so, why did the Lebanese Maronites reject the concept of Arab nationalism and insist on a Lebanese identity? Why did the Egyptians hesitate before including themselves under th

Wishing You a New MENA

Journalist and author of A nd Then All Hell Broke Loose: Two Decades in the Middle East   said that “Everything changed with the First World War. The Middle East was reorganized, redefined, and the seeds were planted for a century of bloodshed.” He was not entirely right. Bloodshed lasted more than a century actually. Here we are in 2019, and the Middle East and North Africa region – the infamous MENA – is still a boisterous, rowdy zone of political recrimination, military coups, conspiracy theories, historic reminiscence, oil squabbles, and religiously-infused rhetoric. Blood shed of course as well. Well, here we are.  Algeria is set to head to the polls in April. President Abdelaziz Bouteflika will likely secure a fifth mandate. If not, Algeria’s powerbrokers, mainly the military and powerful business elites will enter into an expensive bargain of security versus social and economic stability. Having vested the long-enjoyed tranquillity on a political figure, rather than a