Skip to main content

With Arms Wide Open

 
  The final results of Iraqi parliamentary elections are expected today. Again, the timing is perfect for reaching a consensual arrangement between political leaders over the governance of sectarian-torn Iraq. The current Prime Minister Haidar Al Abadi has received a substantial setback with his bloc´s trailing in third place after Muqtada Al Sader´s Saeroun list and Hadi Al Amiri´s Fatah list. Now, Iraq might see the formation of a government that is led by a Shiite force linked with an anti-US AND anti-Iran controversial figure. Al Sader might be positioned to rule from the back scenes and bring peace to a country that has been ruined by invented religious and ethnic divisions.

Years of rebellion have led the young cleric to reach a stage of maturity and stability in his political and ideological discourses. Once a founder of a militia that fought off the US invasion, and a close ally to Tehran´s political elite, Al Sadr had metamorphosed into a nationalist leader who opted for joining hands with secular groups - including the Iraqi Communist party - in the elections. Snubbing Iran, the young political leader has taken a new route towards Iraqi nationalism. Whether this was a political stunt to prove to the Iraqi public that he carries no Shiite-exclusive agenda or a catch all electoral strategy it remains to be seen. However, both the US and Iran will now be forced to support their proxies through their art of clandestine intervention in order to ensure that whoever gets to lead Iraq must be an ally, not a foe. In other words, anyone is fine by both camps as look as he takes sides and sidelines nationalist interests for the benefit of Iranian and American patrons. After all, the US just pulled out of the nuclear deal with Iran and will ensure that Iraq remains a battle ground in its war with Tehran. Iran´s leadership will not let the opportunity of using Iraq again in its confrontation with Washington; fangs and talons will emerge, and Iraq will curse the day it saw democracy.

A figure such Al Sader  - albeit all its controversy - might remind the Iraqis and the region at large that the years of using Arab nations as proxies for international confrontations is over. Prioritising the interests and concerns of citizens  - irrespective of their ethnicity or religious affiliation  - should be the guiding force behind forming a government in Baghdad. If Al Sader can bring peace to Iraq, then he should be received with Sader Rahib (arms wide open).   

Arab nationalism has died with the death of Saddam Hussein´s Baath (resurrection) party in Iraq; the revival of the resurrection party will require resuscitation efforts from the Iraqi people who must join breaths and hands to place their interests as a nation before any other consideration. Slogans of Arab unity and defence against external agendas might have been a rhetoric that was been murdered and buried deep...exhuming the remains of these calls does not seem such a bad idea at the moment. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Just as Orwell Said

         George Orwell said in his famous book 1984 that “first they steal the words, then they steal the meaning”, accurately foreseeing the political actions of world leaders and their manipulation of public opinion. His words are ever so precise once one examines the vocabulary applied by a number of world leaders when describing the policies and regimes of troubling countries: axis of evil, war on terror, terrorist killers, harbourers of fundamentalism etc. Ironic it is to see how those who were once described to have been allies with Satan himself seem to show good will in a matter of very few years. Iran is one very good example of this. The Persian nation has come out as a winner in the Geneva talks that were held in October, where not only did it get applauded for the concessions it offered, but it also ensured the west’s acceptance of its regional weight. Everyone seems to be more relaxed after the negotiations and a new round of talks has been set for November.  
3 comments
Read more

Pan-Arabism vs. Middle Easternism?

             A rab Nationalism, a romantic concept that moved poets to write ballads, intellectuals to preach volumes, activists to passionately organize and the masses to cheer freedom. A concept introduced by students at the American University of Beirut in the last phases of the ageing Ottoman Empire and studied in secret societies. This concept developed and led, under western planning, to the Great Arab Revolt in 1916. The slogans of Arab revival and freedom from Ottoman tyranny swept the Arab nations, where hopes of independence and self-rule were promised by the restoration of Arab control over the area. Then problems arose. Who are Arabs? What is an Aran nation? How does it extend geographically? Is it an area that encompasses people who speak the same language and share the same history? If so, why did the Lebanese Maronites reject the concept of Arab nationalism and insist on a Lebanese identity? Why did the Egyptians hesitate before including themselves under th
Post a Comment
Read more

Wishing You a New MENA

Journalist and author of A nd Then All Hell Broke Loose: Two Decades in the Middle East   said that “Everything changed with the First World War. The Middle East was reorganized, redefined, and the seeds were planted for a century of bloodshed.” He was not entirely right. Bloodshed lasted more than a century actually. Here we are in 2019, and the Middle East and North Africa region – the infamous MENA – is still a boisterous, rowdy zone of political recrimination, military coups, conspiracy theories, historic reminiscence, oil squabbles, and religiously-infused rhetoric. Blood shed of course as well. Well, here we are.  Algeria is set to head to the polls in April. President Abdelaziz Bouteflika will likely secure a fifth mandate. If not, Algeria’s powerbrokers, mainly the military and powerful business elites will enter into an expensive bargain of security versus social and economic stability. Having vested the long-enjoyed tranquillity on a political figure, rather than a
Post a Comment
Read more